Platform architecture
01 / WORKSHOPThree dimensions on one canvas: what the platform can do, the engineering work that builds it, and the products those capabilities could ladder into.
Capabilities, engineering work, and product directions on a single canvas. Cell colour names the capability; intensity is how much of it is in play.
Five layers that describe what the platform can do, independent of any one product. Three are foundational; two are high-leverage differentiation axes.
Fourteen concrete pieces of engineering that together build the five capabilities — definition clarity, difficulty, risk, and current maturity.
Six product directions the work could ladder up to: who buys, what they get, known demand, blockers, and which capability layers each one needs.
Four-lane roadmap across domain model, commercial platform, cloud surface, and the Hamburg on-premise tier — read left to right through Q2, Q3, and Q4 entry.
Product & domain
02 / MOCKSFarmer-facing interfaces and a domain comic that walks a soil sample from field to digital intelligence.
Draft pathogen-pressure profile for an Iberian SHD olive estate: parcel risk, contributor breakdown, and a measurement-first reading of the asset.
Co-design mock for the SLM / Iberia spine: asset views, operator rollup, and an analytical template generalised from a walnut and almond case.
Step-by-step lineage told from the sample’s point of view. Each panel is anchored to a domain aggregate, lifecycle rule, or invariant.
Research & operations
03 / LABSVendor surveys, spend audits, and tooling comparisons used while building the platform.
Explorable landscape of self-hostable prior art between filing papers and synthesising across them — ten bands, ~150 projects, with freshness and language guidance.
Token spend, caching efficiency, and unit-cost benchmarks across production model providers for the Soilytix engineering agents.
Filterable comparison of thirteen meeting-notetaker tools across hard constraints, pricing, capture, privacy, and intelligence features.